Congratulations, listeners of The Paracast! You did it! You dragged Gene Steinberg and that other guy into acknowledging the cases Jeff Ritzmann and I closed on hypnosis and David Jacobs back in 2010!
Gene ends his missive on alien abduction research in the Paracast yesterday’s-news-letter dated October 25, 2015 (which is tomorrow, ironically) on this hopeful note:
“Maybe it’s time to tear down the walls and view the evidence from a fresh perspective.”
Well, you’re all in luck, because while Gene was busily fighting against the change he now tepidly, perhaps begrudgingly, calls for, Jeff and I were hard at work with Paratopia and Project Core, creating the very conversation you’re having now and then moving beyond it. So, if you’d like to see what the future holds for The Paracast’s epic inquiries, why wait? Dive into Paratopia’s past! We’ve got so many episodes of post-Jacobs, post-hypnosis, post-abduction-research conversations all lined up for binge-listening that it will take years of listening to The Paracast one week at a time to get there. And that’s assuming Gene and whichever co-host are even capable of holding the kinds of deep conversations they are baby-stepping toward now.
What do 2016 and 2017 hold for The Paracast’s fresh perspective? No spoilers but … let’s just say there are some big revelations coming regarding Budd Hopkins’ work, too. I, for one, cannot wait for Gene and that other guy to figure out the Linda Cortile Case. And I don’t have to. The answers are all here:
And if you’d like to see what an authentic scientific survey of all things paranormal looks like, well that’s free! And it comes to you courtesy of 2014! Perhaps Gene and what’s-his-name will do their revolutionary version of our survey in 2019. But again, why wait? The future is… a few years ago.
Oh, PS: I see where Gene is now claiming that there is some audio prior to the infamous Emma Woods multiple personality disorder audio clip that, should Jacobs release it, might exonerate him. This is nonsense. I have heard all of the audio recordings and read the follow-up emails between Emma and the good doctor. Probably what he’s talking about is the fact that before the session, Jacobs was talking to her about this in a jokey way so that she thought he was… you know… kidding. And then he put her under and implanted the suggestion.
If his defense is that she agreed to let him tell her under hypnosis that he believes she and all abductees have MPD because alien hybrids–excuse me, hubrids–will read that when they read her mind and leave him alone? Then he is nuts. Even by his own loony logic it couldn’t work, because if she doesn’t believe what he’s implanted in her then neither will mind readers. (Let’s not even get into the intergalactic cowardice of an alleged researcher throwing his subject under the alien bus to save himself.)
As to the question of her recording him illegally, he gave her copies of his recordings of the hypnosis sessions. And he knew she recorded their phone calls as he clearly states during their phone calls. But let’s suppose she did record him without his knowledge. And now let’s put that horrible crime up against David Jacobs offering in all seriousness to buy her a chastity belt with nails at the vaginal opening that he said might slow down the brutal, raping hubrids… but also might not. And if not, would at least anger them. Anger the raping, violent terrorists from space… was his recommendation to a woman seeking his help… from the raping, violent terrorists from space… who didn’t exist until he yammered on about his other subjects and their alleged hubrid experiences and then hypnotized her.
What are we arguing about again? Christ, is this thing on?!–The man implanted raping alien hubrid memories in his subject and then tried to buy her sex toys to ward them off or piss them off! As with Bill Cosby, you have to hate women to defend David Jacobs.
The Emma Woods case is a no-brainer and I fully expect Gene to get this and bring the big revelation to his listeners sometime in mid-2021. Then again, maybe not. The Paracast isn’t the “gold standard” of anything and Gene is not, in my opinion, a sharp thinker in this field. It’s just that so many other people are even duller thinkers than he, it makes him look all shiny and sharp. It’s the old joke about a cracker tasting like a 5-star meal to a starving person.
Gene is, if nothing else, a cracker.